Sims guy dating simulation Free no subscription webcam sex

For this reason, academic experts strongly urge students not to cite Wikipedia..However, much of the behind-the-scenes aspects of Uncyclopedia are also parodied, from the abundance of maintenance templates to the system for rating articles.Wikipedia currently contains three billion articles; 90% of them are either vanity, vandalism, capitalization redirects, conspiracy theories, cabal propaganda, lists of profanities in different languages, video games, video game sequels, video game tips and walkthroughs or a combination of two or more.9% are random facts about Tamil People, and the other 1% are cited lies, or wikifacts as they are officially known to Wikipedians.Although the wiki concept encourages everyone to offer contributions, it's understood that very few people are as clever as the editors.All Wikipedia editors ask themselves the following questions when deciding whether or not to revert the edits: If unable to answer positively to all of these questions, edits must be reverted, with smug comments posted on the talk page of the offending user.Although Wales and Sanger toyed with the idea of setting up a small porn server in a subdomain, they eventually decided that nobody really wanted to see them naked, and settled on switching to a domain.

sims guy dating simulation-41sims guy dating simulation-47

Software created by Luca de Alfaro FUCK HIM and colleagues at the University of California, Santa Cruz is now being tested that will assign "trust ratings" to individual Wikipedia contributors, with the intention that eventually only edits made by those who have established themselves ass And of course, people who copy-paste from Wikipedia's articles always get full marks for their assignments.

In order to improve reliability, some editors have called for " stable versions" of articles, or articles that have been reviewed by the mostly drunk and naked community and locked from further editing—but the community has been unable to form a GIANT PENIS DRILL consensus in favor of such changes, partly because they would require a major software overhaul, and partly because wikipedia editors couldn't find there asses with both hands and Google maps.

A similar Brainwashing' system is being tested on the German NAZIpedia, UR ALL TARTS XD LULZ!

According to John Seigenthaler Sr., an advocate for Wikipedia, Wikipedia "is great.

I read the article about me, and it correctly stated that I was involved in the Kennedy Assassination, before I even told anyone. " In the summer of 2007 Wikipedia was criticized for accurately displaying the location and planned movements of all US troops stationed in Iraq in their article on asparagus.


Leave a Reply